Honestly, we did not finish the third (I’ll get to that in a moment). We played the three modules over the course of 4 months. That aside, the initial flow of the game was nice. Extra slices of game setting information were provided in the adventures, but what good is it knowing the languages available and necessary only in the third book when you’ve made characters already and played through the first two with them? Another issue is that we started playing the adventures before all 3 modules had been released. Certainly, we, as players, would have had an easier time preparing for the setting if we had more than a couple handouts that gave very small basics.
This however, in my opinion is backwards, and it would be much better for all involved if a more well presented knowledge of the game setting was available before any adventures were released for it. It is much cheaper and easier to produce an adventure for a 3E setting than it is to write the sourcebook. This stems from an issue that often the current situation has the industry following. This probably didn’t totally aid our ability to fully function in the steam punk society.
The Gm presented us with some reference aids that helped us get along a little bit, but honestly, most of the players came to the game with characters meant for the generic Greyhawk setting. My initial impressions were that this was a decent setting for 3E. Nonetheless, I feel that the GM that ran the adventures stayed very true to what was presented with an exception or two which I will note. This means that I come from the perspective of how it ended up not how it was supposed to end up.
#Duteus witchfire trilogy Pc#
Let me preface this review by saying that I am coming from the point of view of a player who initially played the three adventures as a PC rather than as a GM who ran the game.
0 kommentar(er)
